重度哮喘的共病负担与临床管理挑战:泛欧洲SHARP研究的启示
Comorbidity Burden and Clinical Management Challenges in Severe Asthma: Insights from a Pan-European SHARP Study.
文献信息
| PMID | 42936732 |
|---|---|
| 原文 | 在 PubMed 查看原文 ↗ |
| 发表日期 | 2026 |
| 作者 | Saša Rink |
| 作者单位 | Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Allergy, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. |
| 期刊 | Journal of asthma and allergy |
| SCI 分区 | Q2 |
| IF | 3.7 |
| 研究类型 | 临床研究 · 临床 |
| 所属专科 | 鼻科 |
中文摘要
背景与目的: 重度哮喘(SA)常合并多种共病,这些共病显著恶化临床结局。然而,临床实践中对哮喘共病的识别仍不明确。我们旨在评估SA登记系统中共病记录方面的差距,评价欧洲各地共病患病率及其差异,并探讨医生对多病共存管理的观点,重点关注共病的真实世界识别与记录。
方法: 我们分析了来自22个欧洲登记系统的13,245例SA患者数据。将32种临床相关共病分为五类(2型(T2)相关、肺部、肺外、心理生理及类固醇相关),以评估登记系统的捕获情况和各国患病率。一项泛欧洲在线调查纳入239名SA专科医生,探讨多病共存管理的临床方法和资源。
结果: 在各登记系统中,T2相关和肺部共病的捕获一致性高于肺外、心理生理及类固醇相关疾病,且国家间差异显著。记录的最常见共病包括慢性鼻窦炎(40%)、鼻息肉(35%)、肥胖(30%)、过敏性鼻炎(30%)和胃食管反流病(29%),但其患病率在各国间差异很大。41%的受访医生缺乏多学科团队(MDT)可及性,时间不足(36%)和资金不足(26%)被报告为主要障碍。85%的受访者承认多病共存对哮喘结局的影响,并表示需要改进培训和患者教育以改善其管理。
结论: 共病在欧洲SA人群中高度流行,但在各登记系统中记录不一致,尤其是类固醇相关疾病。然而,这些发现应在登记系统结构、诊断路径和数据捕获实践存在国家间异质性的背景下解读。资源有限进一步制约了最佳的多病共存管理。这些发现强调需要标准化登记方案、改善MDT可及性以及开展有针对性的教育。本研究首次对SA登记系统中的共病捕获进行了泛欧洲评估,并同时呈现了医生对多病共存的观点。
英文摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Severe asthma (SA) is commonly complicated by multiple comorbidities, which significantly worsen clinical outcomes. However, the recognition of asthma comorbidities in clinical practice remains unclear. We aimed to assess gaps in comorbidity documentation in SA registries, evaluate comorbidity prevalence and variation across Europe, and explore physician perspectives on multimorbidity management, with a focus on real-world recognition and documentation of comorbidities.
METHODS: We analysed data from 13,245 SA patients across 22 European registries. Thirty-two clinically relevant comorbidities were grouped into five categories (type 2 (T2)-related, pulmonary, extrapulmonary, psychophysiological, and steroid-related) to assess registry capture and national prevalence. A pan-European online survey of 239 SA specialists explored clinical approaches and resources for multimorbidity management.
RESULTS: Across the registries, T2-related and pulmonary comorbidities were captured more consistently than extrapulmonary, psychophysiological, and steroid-related conditions, with substantial variation between countries. The most prevalent recorded comorbidities included chronic sinusitis (40%), nasal polyps (35%), obesity (30%), allergic rhinitis (30%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (29%) but their prevalence varied widely across countries. Forty-one percent of surveyed physicians lacked multidisciplinary team (MDT) access, with lack of time (36%) and funding (26%) reported as the main barriers. Eighty-five percent of respondents acknowledged the impact of multimorbidity on asthma outcomes and expressed a need for improved training and patient education to improve its management.
CONCLUSION: Comorbidities are highly prevalent in European SA populations but remain inconsistently documented across registries, especially steroid-related conditions. However, these findings should be interpreted in the context of heterogeneity in registry structure, diagnostic pathways, and data capture practices across countries. Limited resources further constrain optimal multimorbidity management. These findings highlight the need for standardized registry protocols, improved MDT access, and targeted education. This study provides the first pan-European evaluation of comorbidity capture in SA registries alongside physician perspectives on multimorbidity.