口咽吞咽困难患者进餐管理的应做与不应做:意大利吞咽学学会改良德尔菲共识研究
Do's and Don'ts in Mealtime Management for People with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Modified Delphi Consensus Study from the Italian Society of Deglutology.
文献信息
| PMID | 42884720 |
|---|---|
| 原文 | 在 PubMed 查看原文 ↗ |
| 发表日期 | 2026 |
| 作者 | Nicole Pizzorni |
| 作者单位 | Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy. |
| 期刊 | Nutrients |
| SCI 分区 | Q1 |
| IF | 6.5 |
| 研究类型 | 指南共识 · 临床 |
| 所属专科 | 咽喉科 |
中文摘要
背景: 进餐是日常生活、健康和社交参与的核心,但口咽吞咽困难(OD)患者的进餐安全性和愉悦感可能受到影响。尽管OD对躯体与心理社会健康及日常功能有广泛影响,临床实践中仍缺乏针对全面进餐管理的结构化指导。为填补这一空白,制定了一套基于专家共识的“应做与不应做”建议,涵盖四个与进餐相关的领域。方法:由意大利吞咽学学会推动的一项改良德尔菲共识研究,纳入了53名OD及相关学科的多学科专家小组。专家们围绕四个领域制定“应做”和“不应做”陈述:以营养为重点的饮食处方、餐食准备、进餐体验以及患者和照护者教育。经小组召集人审核后,61条陈述采用3点序数量表并附加“无法表达意见”选项进行了两轮在线投票。共识预先定义为一致率≥75%。两轮之间根据参与者意见对陈述进行修订,以确保临床准确性和实际适用性。结果:第一轮应答率为85%,第二轮为97.8%。第二轮后,61条陈述中有57条(93.4%)达到共识阈值(一致率≥75%)。结论:OD的进餐管理应个体化并以人为中心,平衡吞咽安全、营养需求、生活质量和进食愉悦感。管理不应仅限于代偿策略,还应包括进餐的社会和关系维度。患者和照护者的积极参与和教育对于支持治疗依从性和建议的日常实施至关重要。跨专业协作和多模式教育策略对于确保OD照护中协调、安全且有效的营养方案至关重要。
英文摘要
Background: Meals are central to daily life, health, and social participation, yet their safety and enjoyment can be compromised in people with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD). Despite the broad impact of OD on physical and psychosocial well-being and daily functioning, structured guidance for comprehensive mealtime management in clinical practice is lacking. To address this gap, a set of expert consensus-based "Do's and Don'ts" covering four meal-related domains was developed. Methods: A modified Delphi consensus study promoted by the Italian Society of Deglutology involved a multidisciplinary panel of 53 experts in OD and related disciplines. Experts developed "Do" and "Don't" statements across four domains: nutrition-focused diet prescription, meal preparation, mealtime experience, and patient and caregiver education. After panel conveners' review, 61 statements underwent two rounds of online voting using a 3-point ordinal scale plus an additional option 'unable to express an opinion'. Consensus was predefined as ≥75% agreement. Statements were revised between rounds based on participants' comments to ensure clinical accuracy and practical applicability. Results: The response rate was 85% for Round 1 and 97.8% for Round 2. After Round 2, 57 of 61 statements (93.4%) reached the consensus threshold (≥75% agreement). Conclusions: Mealtime management in OD should be individualized and person-centered, balancing swallowing safety, nutritional requirements, quality of life, and enjoyment of eating. Management should extend beyond compensatory strategies alone to include the social and relational dimensions of meals. Active involvement and education of patients and caregivers are essential to support therapeutic adherence and daily implementation of recommendations. Interprofessional collaboration and multimodal educational strategies are crucial to ensuring a coordinated, safe, and effective nutritional approach to OD care.