耳鼻喉科Pubmed文献追踪每日 14:00 同步
← 返回全部文献
Article record

喉抬高速度作为放疗后吞咽困难中吞咽安全性的候选动态标志物:一项初步探索性研究

Laryngeal Elevation Velocity as a Candidate Dynamic Marker of Swallowing Safety in Postradiotherapy Dysphagia: A Preliminary Exploratory Study.

临床研究咽喉科IF 3.5Q1

文献信息

中文摘要

背景/目的: 为探讨喉抬高速度(LEV)作为放疗后吞咽困难合并环咽肌功能障碍(CPMD)患者吞咽安全性的候选生理标志物,我们检验了其与气道安全性的关联,以及LEV-上食管括约肌(UES)开放关系在肉毒毒素注射前后是否存在差异,此处肉毒毒素注射被用作受试者内的生理性扰动。
方法: 本回顾性队列研究纳入18例接受环咽肌肉毒毒素注射(中位总剂量30 U;范围20-40 U)并完成干预前后电视透视吞咽检查(VFSS)的放疗后鼻咽癌(NPC)合并CPMD患者。主要结局为穿透-误吸量表(PAS)和UES开放直径;次要结局包括功能性经口摄食量表(FOIS)、喉抬高(LE)和LEV。采用广义估计方程(GEE)并纳入LEV×治疗交互项评估关联在注射前后状态间是否存在差异。
结果: 肉毒毒素注射后,FOIS评分显著改善(中位4至5;p < 0.001),同时LEV(中位149.86至201.12 C2-4%/s;p = 0.027)和UES直径(中位21.10至23.30 C2-4%;p = 0.039)增加;PAS评分和喉抬高位移无显著变化。单变量分析中,较高的LEV与较低的不安全气道侵入(PAS 5-8)几率相关(每增加100单位的比值比0.38;95%置信区间[CI] 0.17-0.86;p = 0.021)。观察到LEV×治疗对UES直径的显著交互作用(p = 0.021)。
结论: 在放疗后NPC合并CPMD患者中,较高的LEV与气道安全性相关,且LEV-UES关系在注射前后状态间存在差异。尽管研究设计不允许得出关于治疗疗效的结论,LEV可能代表一种候选的负荷敏感性吞咽安全性标志物,值得进一步研究。

英文摘要

Background/Objectives: To investigate laryngeal elevation velocity (LEV) as a candidate physiological marker of swallowing safety in post-radiotherapy dysphagia patients with cricopharyngeal muscle dysfunction (CPMD), we examined its association with airway safety and whether the LEV-upper esophageal sphincter (UES) opening relationship differed before versus after botulinum toxin injection, used here as a within-subject physiological perturbation. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 18 post-radiotherapy patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and CPMD who underwent botulinum toxin injection into the cricopharyngeal muscle (median total dose, 30 U; range, 20-40 U) and completed videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSSs) before and after intervention. Primary outcomes were the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and UES opening diameter; secondary outcomes included the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), laryngeal elevation (LE) and LEV. Associations were evaluated using generalized estimating equations (GEEs) with LEV × treatment interaction terms to assess whether they differed across pre- and post-injection states. Results: Following botulinum toxin injection, FOIS scores improved significantly (median, 4 to 5; p < 0.001), with concurrent increases in LEV (median, 149.86 to 201.12 C2-4%/s; p = 0.027) and UES diameter (median, 21.10 to 23.30 C2-4%; p = 0.039); PAS scores and laryngeal elevation displacement did not change significantly. Higher LEV was associated with lower odds of unsafe airway invasion (PAS 5-8) in univariate analysis (odds ratio per 100-unit increase, 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.86; p = 0.021). A significant LEV × treatment interaction was observed for UES diameter (p = 0.021). Conclusions: In post-radiotherapy NPC patients with CPMD, higher LEV was associated with airway safety, and the LEV-UES relationship differed across pre- and post-injection states. Although the study design does not permit conclusions about treatment efficacy, LEV may represent a candidate load-sensitive marker of swallowing safety, warranting further investigation.