情感性非言语发声及其对人工耳蜗的启示：一项范围综述
Affective nonverbal vocalizations and implications for cochlear implants: A scoping review.
文献信息
| PMID | 42854372 |
|---|---|
| 原文 | 在 PubMed 查看原文 ↗ |
| 发表日期 | 2026 |
| 作者 | Beatrice Fumagalli |
| 作者单位 | Cochlear France S.A.S., Vallauris, France; Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone, Aix-Marseille Université & CNRS, Marseille, France; Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Research School of Behavioural and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. Electronic address: beatrice.fumagalli@etu.univ-amu.fr. |
| 期刊 | Hearing research |
| SCI 分区 | Q1 |
| IF | 3.2 |
| 研究类型 | 综述 Meta · 临床 |
| 所属专科 | 耳科 |
中文摘要
背景： 笑声、哭声和尖叫声等非言语发声（NVVs）是情感意义的有力载体，并能触发快速的注意反应。将成人NVVs的特定声学线索与情感感知联系起来的证据在听力正常听者的异质性研究中仍然零散，而在人工耳蜗使用者中则基本缺失。
目的： 梳理将成人NVVs的声学线索与听力正常听者的情绪和显著性感知联系起来的实证证据，并确定人工耳蜗使用者是否存在可比证据。
方法： 遵循PRISMA-ScR指南，纳入经同行评审的研究，这些研究量化了NVVs的声学特征，并将其与听力正常或人工耳蜗听者的感知情感或显著性相关联。二十七项研究（44项实验，2010-2025年）符合纳入标准。
结果： 在听力正常听者中，多种声学线索与情感维度显示出一致关联，但并非以一对一的方式映射到情感意义。总体而言，情感感知依赖于声学线索的组合，并受到叫声类型（如笑声、哭声）的系统性调节。关于显著性的证据集中在30-150 Hz范围内的幅度调制，主要涉及尖叫声。很少有研究比较不同NVV类型之间的线索-感知关联。关于人工耳蜗使用者的证据极为有限：仅有一项研究提供了声学分析，表明情感空间被压缩且依赖基于包络的线索。
结论： NVV感知依赖于整合的线索，其感知作用因叫声类型而异，显著性方面的证据比情感感知方面更为一致。主要空白包括尖叫声之外的NVV显著性、不同叫声类型之间的差异，以及人工耳蜗听者中的线索层面研究。
英文摘要
BACKGROUND: Nonverbal vocalizations (NVVs) like laughs, cries and screams are powerful carriers of affective meaning and trigger rapid attentional responses. Evidence linking specific acoustic cues of adult NVVs to affective perception remains fragmented across heterogeneous studies in typically-hearing listeners, and largely absent in cochlear‑implant users.
OBJECTIVE: To map empirical evidence linking acoustic cues of adult NVVs to emotion and salience perception in typically‑hearing listeners, and to determine whether comparable evidence exists for cochlear implant users.
METHODS: Following PRISMA‑ScR guidelines, peer‑reviewed studies were included that quantified acoustic features of NVVs and related them to perceived affect or salience in typically-hearing or cochlear implant listeners. Twenty-seven studies (44 experiments, 2010-2025) met inclusion criteria.
RESULTS: In typically-hearing listeners, multiple acoustic cues show consistent associations with affective dimensions, but do not map onto affective meaning in a one-to-one manner. Overall, affective perception depends on combinations of acoustic cues and is systematically modulated by call type (e.g., laugh, cry). Evidence concerning salience was concentrated on amplitude modulation in the 30-150 Hz range, mainly in screams. Few studies compared cue-perception associations across NVV types. Evidence for cochlear implant users was extremely limited: only one study provided acoustic analyses, indicating compressed affective spaces and reliance on envelope‑based cues.
CONCLUSION: NVV perception depends on integrated cues whose perceptual roles vary across call types, with more convergent evidence for salience than for affect perception. Major gaps include NVV salience beyond screams, differences across call types, and cue‑level investigations in cochlear implant listeners.