鼻黏膜中的组织驻留记忆T细胞:过敏性鼻炎慢性化与复发的守门人。
Tissue-resident memory T cells in the nasal mucosa: gatekeepers of chronicity and relapse in allergic rhinitis.
文献信息
| PMID | 42827710 |
|---|---|
| 原文 | 在 PubMed 查看原文 ↗ |
| 发表日期 | 2026 |
| 作者 | Xinyu Han |
| 作者单位 | The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China. |
| 期刊 | Frontiers in immunology |
| SCI 分区 | Q1 |
| IF | 7.4 |
| 研究类型 | 综述 Meta · 基础/转化 |
| 所属专科 | 鼻科 |
中文摘要
背景: 过敏性鼻炎(AR)是一种普遍存在的鼻黏膜2型炎症性疾病,其临床病程的定义与其说是急性发作,不如说是复发和对治愈的明显抵抗。尽管AR传统上被框定为一种系统性、IgE驱动的疾病,但越来越多的证据表明鼻黏膜本身是持久、抗原特异性免疫记忆的场所。组织驻留记忆T(TRM)细胞——非再循环、具有长寿特性的淋巴细胞,驻留在屏障组织中——处于理想位置,将短暂的过敏原暴露转化为持续性炎症。方法:本小型综述综合了人类和临床前证据,表明鼻TRM细胞,包括Th2极化的CD4+亚群和最近描述的一种致病性CD8+亚群(首次在复发性慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉,CRSwNP中表征),构成了AR慢性化和免疫治疗后复发的可信——但仍很大程度上是假设性的——细胞基础。结果:我们提出,2025年发现的表达颗粒酶K(GZMK)的CD8+记忆T细胞驱动复发性气道炎症(Lan等,Nature 2025)为理解AR复发提供了一个可转化的框架。我们注意到,关于纯AR中鼻TRM的直接、高分辨率人类证据仍然有限;因此,我们整合了来自CRSwNP、下气道疾病和动物模型的发现作为可转化的证据基础,并明确标记每个结论是已确立的还是假设性的。结论:我们概述了靶向TRM保留、表型或效应分子如何能够补充过敏原免疫治疗。
英文摘要
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a pervasive type-2 inflammatory disorder of the nasal mucosa whose clinical course is defined less by acute flares than by recurrence and apparent resistance to cure. Although AR has traditionally been framed as a systemic, IgE-driven disease, a growing body of evidence points to the nasal mucosa itself as a site of durable, antigen-specific immune memory. Tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells - non-recirculating, longevity-endowed lymphocytes that lodge in barrier tissues - are ideally positioned to convert transient allergen exposure into persistent inflammation. This mini review synthesizes human and preclinical evidence that nasal TRM cells, including Th2-polarized CD4+ subsets and a recently described pathogenic CD8+ subset (first characterized in recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, CRSwNP), constitute a credible - but still largely hypothetical - cellular substrate for AR chronicity and post-immunotherapy relapse. We propose that the 2025 discovery of granzyme K (GZMK)-expressing CD8+ memory T cells driving recurrent airway inflammation (Lan et al., Nature 2025) provides a translatable framework for understanding AR relapse. We note that direct, high-resolution human evidence for nasal TRM in pure AR remains limited; accordingly, we integrate findings from CRSwNP, lower-airway disease, and animal models as a translatable evidence base and explicitly flag where each conclusion is established versus hypothetical. We outline how targeting TRM retention, phenotype, or effector molecules could complement allergen immunotherapy.