人工智能驱动的颅面摄影测量分析用于儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停
Artificial Intelligence-Powered Craniofacial Photogrammetry Analysis of Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
文献信息
| PMID | 42808580 |
|---|---|
| 原文 | 在 PubMed 查看原文 ↗ |
| 发表日期 | 2026 |
| 作者 | Wan-Yi Hsueh |
| 作者单位 | Department of Otolaryngology, Hsinchu Cathay General Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan. |
| 期刊 | Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery |
| SCI 分区 | Q1 |
| IF | 2.9 |
| 研究类型 | AI/ML · 临床 |
| 所属专科 | 鼻科 |
中文摘要
目的: 开发一种人工智能(AI)系统,利用摄影测量进行儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的颅面形态分析。
研究设计: 前瞻性、横断面研究。
地点: 三级医疗医院。
方法: 纳入3至18岁有OSA相关症状的儿童,接受整夜多导睡眠监测(PSG)和标准化颅面摄影测量。儿童中重度OSA定义为PSG中呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)≥5次/小时。使用Dlib工具的AI模型识别面部标志点,Hough变换根据这些坐标计算变量。比较人工测量、AI模型和手动调整AI模型的测量结果。随机森林识别OSA预测模型的前10个变量重要性。
结果: 纳入43名中重度OSA儿童和43名年龄、性别和肥胖匹配的对照。各模型共有的预测因子为下颌平面角、上颌-下颌关系、下面部长度和下面部比例。AI模型的额外预测因子包括下面部和中面部突出度,而调整后的AI模型增加了中面部突出度、下颌后缩和颈颏角。中重度OSA预测的曲线下面积(AUC)在人工、AI模型和调整后AI模型之间相似(0.74 vs 0.71 vs 0.70,ΔAUC的P > 0.05)。AI模型显著缩短了测量时间(人工 vs AI vs 调整后AI = 511.4 vs 0.85 vs 15.8秒,P < .001)。
结论: AI驱动的摄影测量分析系统是一种快速可靠的工具,在评估儿童OSA方面与人工测量具有相当的性能。
英文摘要
OBJECTIVES: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system for craniofacial morphology analysis in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) using photogrammetry.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Tertiary medical hospital.
METHODS: Children aged 3 to 18 years with OSA-related symptoms were enrolled and underwent overnight polysomnography (PSG) and standardized craniofacial photogrammetry. Moderate-to-severe OSA in children was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5 events/h in PSG. An AI model using the Dlib tool identified facial landmarks, and the Hough transform calculated variables from these coordinates. Measurements by humans, the AI model, and a manually adjusted AI model were compared. Random forest identified the top 10 variable importance for the OSA prediction model.
RESULTS: Forty-three children with moderate-to-severe OSA and 43 age-, gender-, and obesity-matched controls were included. Shared predictors across models were mandibular plane angle, maxillary-mandibular relationship, lower facial length, and lower facial proportion. Additional predictors for the AI model included lower- and mid-face projection, while the adjusted AI model added mid-face projection, retrusive mandible, and cervicomental angle. The area under the curve (AUC) values for moderate-to-severe OSA prediction were similar in human, AI model, and adjusted AI model (0.74 vs 0.71 vs 0.70, P for ΔAUC > 0.05). The AI model significantly reduced measurement time (human vs AI vs adjusted AI = 511.4 vs 0.85 vs 15.8 seconds, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: The AI-powered photogrammetry analysis system is a rapid and reliable tool with comparable performance to human measurements in evaluating pediatric OSA.