耳鼻喉科Pubmed文献追踪每日 14:00 同步
← 返回全部文献
Article record

抗PD-1/PD-L1免疫检查点抑制剂与肺癌患者2型气道炎症之间的关联:IMMUNEO回顾性病例系列研究

Association Between anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Type 2 Airway Inflammation in Patients with Lung Cancer: the IMMUNEO Retrospective Case Series.

临床研究鼻科IF 7.7Q1

文献信息

中文摘要

背景: 靶向PD-1/PD-L1的免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已彻底改变肺癌治疗,但免疫介导的并发症日益受到关注,其对2型炎症和慢性气道疾病的影响仍不明确。皮质类固醇是嗜酸性气道疾病的标准治疗,但在抗PD-1/PD-L1治疗的患者中却有害。
目的: 我们在真实世界队列中研究了ICIs对血嗜酸性粒细胞计数(BEC)、慢性气道疾病发生和急性加重的影响。
方法: 这项回顾性研究分析了127例连续接受PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的临床、生物学和影像学数据。收集了BEC、肺功能、合并哮喘或COPD、急性加重频率、皮质类固醇使用情况。ROC曲线确定了预测急性加重风险的嗜酸性粒细胞阈值。
结果: 一半患者患有COPD(n=47)或哮喘(n=13),三分之一为新诊断,11例(8.7%)在治疗期间出现急性加重,其中9例频繁加重(≥2次/年)。BEC在ICI治疗期间显著升高,在急性加重者中升高更明显(p=0.0013)。治疗前BEC >275个细胞/mm3与急性加重发生相关,而治疗期间值 >345个细胞/mm3提供了更好的预测(AUC 0.73,67%敏感性;83%特异性)。在多变量分析中,急性加重与FEV1增加10%呈负相关(OR=0.70;95%CI=0.46-0.99),与 concomitant 全身性皮质类固醇使用呈正相关(OR=10.34;95%CI=1.81-69.27),以及与治疗期间嗜酸性粒细胞升高呈正相关(每102个细胞/mm3,OR=1.15;95%CI=1.01-1.36)。
结论: ICIs可能揭示或放大潜在的T2气道炎症。嗜酸性粒细胞计数升高是一个特异性但预测性较弱的信号,应促使进行监测而非过度解读,而计数低则令人安心。

英文摘要

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 have revolutionized lung cancer therapy, but immune-mediated complications are a growing concern, and their impact on type 2 inflammation and chronic airway disease remains unclear. Corticosteroids, standard for eosinophilic airway diseases, are detrimental in anti-PD-1/PD-L1-treated patients.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of ICIs on blood eosinophil counts (BEC), chronic airway disease development and exacerbations in a real-world cohort.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed clinical, biological, and imaging data from 127 consecutive patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer. BEC, lung function, comorbid asthma or COPD, frequency of exacerbations, corticosteroid use werecollected. ROC curves identified eosinophil thresholds predictive of exacerbation risk.
RESULTS: Half of the patients had COPD (n=47) or asthma (n=13), one third newly diagnosed, and 11 (8.7%) exacerbated on treatment, 9 of them frequently (≥2/year). BEC increased significantly during ICI, more so among exacerbators (p=0.0013). Pre-treatment BEC >275 cells/mm3 was associated with exacerbation onset, while on-treatment values >345 cells/mm3 offered better prediction (AUC 0.73, 67% sensitivity; 83% specificity). In multivariable analysis, exacerbations were negatively associated with 10% increase in FEV1 (OR=0.70; 95%CI=0.46-0.99) and positively associated with concomitant systemic corticosteroid use (OR=10.34; 95%CI=1.81-69.27), and on-treatment eosinophil rise (OR=1.15; 95%CI=1.01-1.36 per 102 cells/mm3).
CONCLUSION: ICIs may unmask or amplify underlying T2 airway inflammation. A raised eosinophil count is a specific but weakly predictive signal that should prompt surveillance rather than be over-interpreted, whereas a low count is reassuring.