无哮喘青少年过敏性鼻炎病程与小气道功能障碍:一项横断面脉冲振荡研究
Allergic Rhinitis Duration and Small-Airway Dysfunction in Adolescents Without Asthma: A Cross-Sectional Impulse Oscillometry Study.
文献信息
| PMID | 42779210 |
|---|---|
| 原文 | 在 PubMed 查看原文 ↗ |
| 发表日期 | 2026 |
| 作者 | Gulce Polat |
| 作者单位 | Department of Pediatrics, Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Medicine, Aydın, Türkiye. |
| 期刊 | The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma |
| SCI 分区 | Q3 |
| IF | 1.9 |
| 研究类型 | 临床研究 · 临床 |
| 所属专科 | 鼻科 |
中文摘要
目的: 过敏性鼻炎(AR)是一种黏膜炎症性疾病,日益被视为统一气道框架的一部分,但在无哮喘的青少年中,随着AR持续存在,下气道功能是否恶化仍不清楚。我们使用脉冲振荡(IOS)来检验AR病程与小气道功能之间的关系,并检测血清内皮素(endocan,内皮细胞特异性分子-1),其与AR中气道功能的关系尚不明确,作为候选全身生物标志物。
方法: 40名未接受过治疗、对气传过敏原致敏的AR青少年(12-17岁)和37名年龄和性别相当的非特应性对照者接受了IOS、血清endocan测定(ELISA)、特异性IgE检测和皮肤点刺试验。症状采用视觉模拟量表评分,核心IOS指标以年龄和性别校正的z评分表示。
结果: 患者与对照之间没有任何IOS参数存在差异。然而,较长的AR病程与较高的总气道阻力(zR5:r = 0.323,p = 0.042)和较低的电抗(zX5:r = -0.502,p < 0.001)相关;特异性IgE也随年龄、病程和严重程度而增加。患者与对照的血清endocan水平相似(中位数200.8 vs 218.8 ng/mL;p = 0.517),并且在AR组内,endocan与严重程度、持续性或IOS参数均不相关。
结论: 更严重的振荡法小气道功能障碍与更长的AR病程相关,支持使用IOS评估长期AR青少年的下气道功能。血清endocan不能区分患者与对照;由于未进行配对气道采样,AR中是否存在任何endocan信号仅限于气道黏膜仍属推测。
英文摘要
OBJECTIVE: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a mucosal inflammatory disease increasingly viewed within a united-airway framework, yet whether lower-airway function deteriorates as AR persists in adolescents without asthma remains unclear. We used impulse oscillometry (IOS) to examine the relationship between AR duration and small-airway function, and examined serum endocan (endothelial cell-specific molecule-1), whose relationship to airway function in AR is unknown, as a candidate systemic biomarker.
METHODS: Forty treatment-naïve, aeroallergen-sensitized adolescents (12-17 years) with AR and 37 non-atopic controls of comparable age and sex underwent IOS, serum endocan measurement (ELISA), specific IgE testing, and skin prick testing. Symptoms were scored on a visual analog scale, and core IOS indices were expressed as age- and sex-adjusted z-scores.
RESULTS: No IOS parameter differed between patients and controls. However, longer AR duration was associated with higher total-airway resistance (zR5: r = 0.323, p = 0.042) and lower reactance (zX5: r= -0.502, p < 0.001); specific IgE also increased with age, duration, and severity. Serum endocan levels were similar in patients and controls (median 200.8 vs 218.8 ng/mL; p = 0.517) and, within the AR group, did not correlate with severity, persistence, or IOS parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Greater oscillometric small-airway dysfunction was associated with longer AR duration, supporting the use of IOS to assess lower-airway function in adolescents with long-standing AR. Serum endocan did not distinguish patients from controls; because paired airway sampling was not performed, whether any endocan signal in AR is confined to the airway mucosa remains speculative.