耳鼻喉科Pubmed文献追踪每日 14:00 同步
← 返回全部文献
Article record

专家中心治疗的罕见头颈癌的诊疗模式与质量:欧洲罕见成人实体癌参考网络(EURACAN)注册登记的经验

Pattern and quality of care for rare head and neck cancers treated in expert centres: the experience of the registry of the European Reference Network on Rare Adult Solid Cancers (EURACAN).

临床研究鼻科IF 8.8Q1

文献信息

中文摘要

背景: 罕见头颈癌(HNCs),包括鼻腔鼻窦癌(SNC)、鼻咽癌(NPC)和唾液腺癌(SGC),具有生物学多样性且发病率低,导致指导临床管理的高质量证据有限。本研究在欧洲罕见成人实体癌参考网络(EURACAN)注册登记框架内,评估了意大利这些罕见HNCs的真实世界诊疗模式与质量。
患者与方法: 分析了2018年至2024年间在意大利专家中心诊断或管理的795例罕见HNCs成人患者(152例SNC、201例NPC和442例SGC)的数据。评估的关键指标包括诊断完整性、对欧洲临床实践指南的依从性以及治疗的及时性。分析按肿瘤类型和诊疗环境进行分层。
结果: 大多数患者就诊时已为局部晚期疾病(SNC 70%、NPC 74%和SGC 50%)。80%的NPC病例进行了Epstein-Barr病毒检测。治疗方式异质性较大,尤其是SNC,其多模式治疗差异很大。指南偏离很常见:约50%的局部SGC患者和67%的局部NPC患者未接受指南推荐的治疗。治疗延迟频繁发生,48%-77%的患者未能在推荐时间范围内开始治疗。这些延迟主要与院际转诊路径相关,并且在需要多模式治疗的患者中更为明显。
结论: 这项基于注册登记的分析揭示了罕见HNCs治疗策略的显著变异性以及频繁的治疗延迟,即使在专家中心也是如此。改善转诊协调、提高指南依从性以及及时启动治疗仍然至关重要。EURACAN注册登记是基准比较和提升诊疗质量的有价值工具,可为这些罕见且复杂的癌症提供循证治疗决策支持。

英文摘要

BACKGROUND: Rare head and neck cancers (HNCs), including sinonasal cancers (SNC), nasopharyngeal cancers (NPC), and salivary gland cancers (SGC), are biologically diverse and infrequent, resulting in limited high-quality evidence to guide clinical management. This study evaluated real-world patterns and quality of care in Italy for these rare HNCs within the European Reference Network for Rare Adult Solid Cancers (EURACAN) registry.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 795 adult patients diagnosed or managed at Italian expert centres between 2018 and 2024 with rare HNCs (152 SNC, 201 NPC, and 442 SGC) were analysed. Key indicators assessed included diagnostic completeness, adherence to European clinical practice guidelines, and timeliness of treatment. Analyses were stratified by tumour type and care setting.
RESULTS: Most patients presented with locally advanced disease (70% SNC, 74% NPC, and 50% SGC). Epstein-Barr virus testing was carried out in 80% of NPC cases. Treatment approaches were heterogeneous, especially for SNC, where multimodal therapy varied widely. Guidelines deviations were common: ∼50% of patients with localised SGC and 67% of those with localised NPC did not receive guideline-recommended treatments. Treatment delays were frequent, with 48%-77% of patients failing to initiate treatment within recommended timeframes. These delays were predominantly associated with interhospital referral pathways and were more pronounced in patients requiring multimodal treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: This registry-based analysis reveals substantial variability in treatment strategies and frequent treatment delays for rare HNCs, even within expert centres. Improving referral coordination, adherence to guidelines, and timely initiation of treatment remain critical. The EURACAN registry represents a valuable tool for benchmarking and enhancing care quality, supporting evidence-informed treatment decisions for these rare and complex cancers.