耳鼻喉科Pubmed文献追踪每日 14:00 同步
← 返回全部文献
Article record

名称之中有何含义?——已发表单侧唇裂修复技术的范围综述

What's in a Name?-A Scoping Review of Published Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair Techniques.

综述 Meta鼻科IF 2.1Q3

文献信息

中文摘要

目的: 量化已发表、且描述详细到足以被复现的唇裂修复技术的数量。设计:符合PRISMA的范围综述。场所:不适用。患者/参与者:66篇已发表文章。干预:原发性单侧唇裂修复。主要结局指标:关于14个预设步骤的数据:术前矫治装置的使用、皮肤设计与标记、局部麻醉技术、皮肤切开、肌肉解剖、黏膜处理、系带成形术/系带处理、肌肉重新对合、鼻底关闭、红唇关闭、皮肤关闭、鼻翼处理、鼻成形术以及术后支撑。结果:共识别出4种被视为“原创”的技术:Rose、Mirault、Hagedorn和Millard。Millard技术被改良最多(n=24,36.4%)。总体而言,27篇(40.9%)文章将其技术设计报告为“直线型”,31篇(47.0%)为“旋转推进型”,8篇(12.1%)为“解剖亚单位型”。皮肤标记设计是描述最详细的步骤,有53篇(80.3%)文章;肌肉解剖和重新对合均有47篇(71.2%)描述。报告最少的步骤是系带处理,仅1篇(1.5%)描述。没有文章报告全部14个术中步骤,仅2篇(3.0%)报告了14个步骤中的13个。结论:尽管唇裂手术已有大量改良,但对修复步骤的深入描述仍然匮乏。对受训者而言,这可能成为理解唇裂修复的障碍。随着全球对唇裂手术教育需求的增长,术语的一致性和技术步骤描述的准确性至关重要。

英文摘要

ObjectiveTo quantify the number of published cleft lip repair techniques that are described in substantial detail to be reproduced.DesignPRISMA-compliant scoping review.SettingN/A.Patients, Participants66 published articles.InterventionsPrimary unilateral cleft lip repair.Main Outcome MeasuresData on 14 predefined steps: use of pre-surgical devices, skin design and marking, local anesthesia technique, skin dissection, muscle dissection, mucosal management, frenuloplasty/frenulum management, muscular reapproximation, nasal floor closure, vermillion closure, skin closure, alar management, rhinoplasty, and post-operative stenting.ResultsFour techniques were identified as being "original": Rose, Mirault, Hagedorn, and Millard. Millard's technique was modified the most (n = 24, 36.4%). In total, 27 (40.9%) articles reported their technique design as "straight line," 31 (47.0%) "rotation advancement," and 8 (12.1%) "anatomic subunit." Skin marking design was the most detailed step with 53 (80.3%) articles; muscular dissection and re-approximation were both described in 47 (71.2%). The least reported step was frenulum management with only 1 (1.5%) described. No articles reported all 14 intra-operative steps, and only 2 (3.0%) reported 13/14 steps.ConclusionsDespite substantial modifications in cleft lip surgery, there is a paucity of in-depth descriptions of the steps of repair. For trainees, this can be a barrier to gaining understanding of lip repair. As the appetite for cleft surgery education grows globally, consistency in terminology and accuracy in describing technical steps is crucial.